Nic Ferrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>> "Aaron M. Renn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/18/99 8:58:08 PM >>>
> >It might make more sense for your javax.servlet implementation to
> live
> >with the Jakarta project rather than Classpath. It appears that it
> >would fit nicely there.
>
> I would urge the Classpath community to think again on this.
>
> There is a GNU implementation of the Servlet API (GNU Paperclips) and
> a GNU implementation of the JSP system (GNU-JSP).
>
> It seems to me that the best option would be for GNU to have a more
> embraching Java umbrella under which Classpath, Paperclips, JSP and
> the other free Java stuff can go.
>
> But if Classpath don't want the free javax.servlet implementation
> then GNU-Paperclips will gladly pick it up as a more generic part of
> an entirely free server side Java platform.
Well, I was unaware of these other GNU projects. I would tend to agree
that is probably a better place for them to live. Of course nothing
is stopping anyone from using this code as it is free software.
--
Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
