Please add my name to the list and please keep pushing as my more vocal Mac 
users will not tolerate this version.

________________________________

From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators on behalf of Nathaniel Austin
Sent: Fri 1/25/2008 09:35
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 4.1.3 Look and Feel



We're pushing on it, but no official word yet.

Nate

Osborne, Bruce W. (NS) wrote:
> Nate,
>
> Do you have any idea whether there will be another Macintosh agent to
> resolve the CPU usage and Application folder permission issues?
>
> Bruce Osborne
> Liberty University
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Austin
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 8:55 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [CLEANACCESS] 4.1.3 Look and Feel
>
> David,
>
> 4.1.3 has no GUI changes on the Windows agent. The Mac agent GUI was
> redesigned to better fit the Mac OS style.
>
> It does add in the new Web Agent functionality which is different, but
> that is optional, and if you already have the agent deployed you
> wouldn't be switching to the web agent anyways.
>
> As for the disconnect issues, they were caused by a vlan change
> detection algorithm in the 4.1.3 agent. The problem occurs when clients
> cannot arp for their default gateway. This then triggers an IP
> release/renew on the client.
>
> In quite a few environments, it seems there are arp issues, and this
> caused numerous disconnect issues with that feature. That feature has
> been disabled by default in the 4.1.3.1 agent. You can still enable it
> in that version if you need it (namely in OOB scenarios) and arp is
> working properly in your environment, but it is off by default and you
> will not see the disconnect issues using that agent.
>
> Nate
>
>
>
> David Pifer wrote:
>  
>> We are getting ready to roll out 4.1.3 in the next 30 to 60 days. We
>> are on 4.1.1 and haven't had a chance to do anything with the 4.1.3
>> product yet in the lab. I am aware of the "new features" etc but I
>> am curious. Is the end user interface different or does it look pretty
>>    
>
>  
>> much the same?
>> 
>> Our management freaks out if the interface is different. Doesn't
>> matter about the back end and features. Just the look and feel.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>>
>> David L. Pifer - N9YNF
>> Network Engineering Services
>> Indiana State University, Office of Information Technology
>> 210 N. 7th St., Rankin Hall R044, Terre Haute, IN 47809
>> 812.237.2923 office  812.237.4361 fax
>>    

Reply via email to