Thanks for the information everyone. In response to this I've been testing the 4.1.3.1 client and it does seem to resolve the issue with LiveUpdate in Vista. I haven't run into any other problems with it so far, but it sounds like some of you are having problems with it. Any issues I should look out for in testing? We are running 4.1.2.1 Manager with a login timeout.

Thanks again

Isabelle Graham
American University


Libby Garner wrote:
We are currently running 4.1.2 Manager, 4.1.3.1 Client.  We had this problem
in August when school started (both Vista and XP).  I don't remember exactly
what version of the client we were running then, but I think it was the same
as the Manager, 4.1.2. I saw a machine with this problem just last month. Since we have the temporary role set to 10 minutes, we tell the students to
open the program and run LiveUpdate using the LiveUpdate button on the
Symantec application.  They can get through it within the 10 minutes time
limit and then we don't have to wait to see if the Client is going to work
or not.

I would be interested in hearing the outcome of the TAC... maybe they'll be
able to fix the problem.

LDGarner
Kenyon College


On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:23:37 -0500, Isabelle Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

        We're seeing an increase in users running Vista on our network so we're
currently testing enforcement of our anti-virus requirements in Vista. Our
current CCA client version is 4.1.2.2 and the version of Symantec Anti-Virus we
distribute to our users for Vista is 10.2.0.276.
        In our test environment we've set up CCA to require that a recognized
anti-virus product is installed and the definitions are up to date. CCA is
recognizing SAV fine and catching the out of date definitions, but the "Update"
button in the CCA client is not launching LiveUpdate at all. Has anyone else
seen any problems like this? We have an open TAC with Cisco but they have been
slow to respond to us.

Thanks.

Isabelle Graham
Network Security
American University
Washington DC
=========================================================================

Reply via email to