Hey Sean,
Mac 4.1.3.1 agent is up on Cisco.com now. It resolves the high CPU defect.
Nate
Hennessey, Sean wrote:
I think it really depends on your deployment. We use inband, virtual
gateway and are not running a whole ton of checks and it seems to be
going fine... Well, as fine as any version of Clean Access we've
implemented (particularly with Macs, we've had some serious annoyances
with each version so far).
Should the Mac client get fixed to not take up all the system resources
(have we had any word on this?), we at the Univ. of Portland would be
fully up to 4.1.3.1 and chugging away fine.
- Sean
----
Sean Hennessey
Networking and Information Security Systems Administrator
The University of Portland
-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Stewart
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 1:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Thoughts on 4.1.3?
Spring break is next week for us. How is everyone on the list feeling
about 4.1.3.1? After watching the list after this release we decided to
hold off. I still have some mixed feelings about this release but
wanted to see how the list felt.
Thanks!
Dennis Xu wrote:
We upgraded to CCA 4.1.3.0 with agent 4.1.3.1 yesterday and haven't
seen
any issues. But if you have double quotes in the agent download page
text, your agent download page maybe messed up after the upgrade. This
happened to us. The workaround is to replace all the double quotes
with
single quotes. The bug ID for this issue is CSCsm32684.
Dennis Xu
Network Analyst(CCS)
University of Guelph
5198244120 x 56217
-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Diggins
Sent: February-05-08 1:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Thoughts on 4.1.3?
I'm looking to upgrade our CCA 4.1.2.0 up to 4.1.3.0 (with agent
4.1.3.1)
shortly. We don't use the Macintosh agent. I'm not interested in most
of
the new features but I'd like support for the latest AV software, and
64
bit Windows would be nice as well.
I haven't heard anything very positive about this version. Is it
stable
enough now or should I wait for the next one?
Cisco folks, is there a 4.1.3.1 Server update imminent?
-Mike
