What type of switches are you using?  If it is Nortel their baystack 450 
switches seem to have an awful time with autonegotiation under certain 
circumstances.  The solution is to force them to the desired setting.  No 
other Nortel switches exhibit this issue.  The 450s are already MD and 
support will be discontinued I think in 2010.  I would still verify any 
errors on both the switches side and the client side.  You could have a 
broadcast storm.  What is the cpu and interface usage on the CCA box (both 
the cam and the cas).  If your running in VGW mode you could simply plug a 
X/O cable inplace of the CAS, which would either eliminate the CAS as the 
issue or point to the cas as the issue.  I have also seen slow logins with 
CAM that have many rules.  I can't remember what version but Cisco 
supposedly put a cron job to clean up the postgres DB.  I found that it 
didn't actually add the cron job when I did my upgrade and I added it. The 
command is vaccumdb.

Sincerely,
Sidney Eaton, CCNA, Network+, NCSS, NCDE, CCSE
Network Technician
Ferris State University
205 West Building
Big Rapids, Mi 49307
(231) 591-5388
For Support Call (231) 591-4822 or www.ferris.edu/tac



Deborah Hovey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 
<[email protected]>
08/21/2008 07:56 AM
Please respond to
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 
<[email protected]>


To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
Re: HELP!!!!!!!!!!






That's what we're told, but they opened a TAC case for us anyway.  I 
suspect database corruption or a slow hardware death of some kind.

>>> "Osborne, Bruce W. (NS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/20/08 7:18 PM >>>
Deb,

Are you sure Cisco doesn't support 4.0.4 on Dell hardware? At one time we 
were running 4.0.4 on Dell PowerEdge 850 servers, supported by a Cisco 
contract. We are now running 4.1.2.1 on the same servers.

Bruce Osborne
Liberty University

________________________________________
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Deborah Hovey 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 5:34 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [CLEANACCESS] HELP!!!!!!!!!!

They don't support our version running on a Dell server regardless- 
Unfortunately, I don't think it's a port speed issue- setting them back 
doesn't seem to be helping!

>>> Jeffery Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/20/08 5:21 PM >>>
Hi Deborah,
   It sounds like you were denied support because you don't have a
support contract instead of for hardware reason.   Is that correct?
On Aug 20, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Deborah Hovey wrote:

> No - I didn't get that far - We purchased from Perfigo and don't
> have a software contract I'm told.  SO unless we want to pay $1600,
> we're out of luck I guess.
>
>>>> Nathaniel Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/20/08 4:51 PM >>>
> Deborah,
>
> There is absolutely no reason you should currently be denied support
> for
> running on third party hardware (unless its not in the supported
> list on
> CCO). Do you have a case number?
>
> Nate
>
> Deborah Hovey wrote:
>> Hi All!
>>
>> Today is Freshmen move in and we're in the middle of a nightmare!
>> The CAM and Servers are set to 1000 Full and have been rebooted
>> numerous  times-  yesterday, before the freshmen arrived, we hard
>> coded all of their ports to 10 Half.  When we had several hundred
>> hitting at the same time against 2 servers on one manager, it would
>> take forever, and then return an error saying it was  unable to
>> communicate with the server.  It is not a cert error.  They are
>> timing out trying to reach the server.  When they all went to
>> lunch, we were able to get on for a while.  Is there any reason why
>> 10 half in the Residence Halls would be causing this issue?  I'm
>> running 4.0.4 on Dell 1650s inband.
>>
>> Cisco won't help- they say they no longer support CCA running on a
>> server box etc...  We're considering taking it off line!
>>
>> I appreciate your help!
>>
>> Deb
>> UMW
>>

Reply via email to