We went with the new appliance because Clean Access works for us. We were given SIGNIFICANT discount to move to the appliance. We are glad we did because we have not had to go through the growing pains of another vendors software.
todd Todd Joyce Network Engineering Team Lead Radford University [email protected] (540) 831-7777 Keep your boots and ChapStick and ice hotels. Give me shorts and sandals and a thirty-blocker. Temperance Brennan - Monday Mourning From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Osborne, Bruce W. (NS) Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 5:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: 4.5 or 4.5.1 Don, We are in the process of migrating from Clean Access (4.1.3.1) to Aruba ECS (Bradford Campus Manager) 4.0.2. We "went live" at the beginning of the semester with wireless, in conjunction with our Aruba wireless rollout. We will add the Cisco switches in our residences this summer. We migrated from Layer-2 VG IB & OOB to Bradford's Layer-3 solution. We are an HA shop on Clean Access & ECS. We will move from 30+ individual servers to FOUR. Our new system is capable of handling up to 12000 simultaneous users. Feel free to contact me offline for more information. Bruce Osborne Network Engineer Liberty University From: Don Click [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 3:24 PM Subject: Re: 4.5 or 4.5.1 Yes, we bought our hardware about 3 years ago, based on the equivalents to the appliance as well. I actually need to make some decisions this year (next 3 or 4 months) on if we are keeping Cisco's NAC, or something else. I know Symantc and Microsoft have something similar, but haven't had a chance to look at anything yet. Any suggestions from the gallery on alternatives? From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Pifer Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: 4.5 or 4.5.1 We bought HP DL360 G5 chassis specifying them to be Identical to the Cisco Hardware about 2 years ago. Now they are great paper weights. Cisco Offered a Huge discount if we bought the new appliances in 30 days. We are now planning to re-evaluate the CCA system next year, we may or may not keep it. Even with Maintenance on the software we would have to buy all new..... I think Cisco did a boo-boo on this one. David L. Pifer - N9YNF - CCNA ISU OIT TIS Network Services 812.237.2923 From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don Click Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:05 To: [email protected] Subject: 4.5 or 4.5.1 Is anyone using 4.5 or 4.5.1 ? Don Click Telecommunications Manager Department of Information Services Denton County (940) 349-3020 - Office (940) 349-5186 - Fax
<<image001.jpg>>
