Thanks Ken for the URL. This is an excellent resource.
R. Paul Sedy, MCSE CCENT Network Manager Computer Services The Master's College [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 661.362.2340 From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Whittaker, Ken Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 5:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: 4.5 or 4.5.1 We to have been forced to look at another alternative to CCA as well. We have been using it in an in-band setup an wish to move to an out-of-band solution. We're looking at others , Impulse Mirage Bradford , right now hoping to have something in place by summer session so we can have it on line and ring out any problems that may come up before the fall session starts. We found this site to be of help in our investigation of a NAC solution. http://connect.educause.edu/Library/Abstract/NetworkAdmissionControlAS/47521 Ken Whittaker--- Keene State College ________________________________ From: "Koffler, George A." <[email protected]> Reply-To: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:12:10 -0600 To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: 4.5 or 4.5.1 We've moved from CCA to Impulse SafeConnect, and are quite happy. It may not fit your needs (it's not a vlan-switching system like many others), but we've actually received calls from students just to thank us for changing! George Koffler UMKC -----Original Message----- From: Don Click <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 2:33 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: 4.5 or 4.5.1 Yes, we bought our hardware about 3 years ago, based on the equivalents to the appliance as well. I actually need to make some decisions this year (next 3 or 4 months) on if we are keeping Cisco's NAC, or something else. I know Symantc and Microsoft have something similar, but haven't had a chance to look at anything yet. Any suggestions from the gallery on alternatives? From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Pifer Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: 4.5 or 4.5.1 We bought HP DL360 G5 chassis specifying them to be Identical to the Cisco Hardware about 2 years ago. Now they are great paper weights. Cisco Offered a Huge discount if we bought the new appliances in 30 days. We are now planning to re-evaluate the CCA system next year, we may or may not keep it. Even with Maintenance on the software we would have to buy all new..... I think Cisco did a boo-boo on this one. David L. Pifer - N9YNF - CCNA ISU OIT TIS Network Services 812.237.2923 [cid:[email protected]] From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don Click Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:05 To: [email protected] Subject: 4.5 or 4.5.1 Is anyone using 4.5 or 4.5.1 ? Don Click Telecommunications Manager Department of Information Services Denton County (940) 349-3020 - Office (940) 349-5186 - Fax
