Errr, I'm going to get in trouble for saying this name I'm sure, but the Juniper UAC system seems great. I stress *seems* as I've only seen demos and have not had the chance to play with it yet. It also supports the Beacon product, so it seems a good way to look if you're falling out of love with NAC.
- Sean From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don Click Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: 4.5 or 4.5.1 Yes, we bought our hardware about 3 years ago, based on the equivalents to the appliance as well. I actually need to make some decisions this year (next 3 or 4 months) on if we are keeping Cisco's NAC, or something else. I know Symantc and Microsoft have something similar, but haven't had a chance to look at anything yet. Any suggestions from the gallery on alternatives? From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Pifer Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: 4.5 or 4.5.1 We bought HP DL360 G5 chassis specifying them to be Identical to the Cisco Hardware about 2 years ago. Now they are great paper weights. Cisco Offered a Huge discount if we bought the new appliances in 30 days. We are now planning to re-evaluate the CCA system next year, we may or may not keep it. Even with Maintenance on the software we would have to buy all new..... I think Cisco did a boo-boo on this one. David L. Pifer - N9YNF - CCNA ISU OIT TIS Network Services 812.237.2923 From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don Click Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:05 To: [email protected] Subject: 4.5 or 4.5.1 Is anyone using 4.5 or 4.5.1 ? Don Click Telecommunications Manager Department of Information Services Denton County (940) 349-3020 - Office (940) 349-5186 - Fax
<<image001.jpg>>
