I think I have missed something.  You say expensive upgrade that coming?
Care to expand?

Thanks.

Lane

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Hennessey, Sean <[email protected]> wrote:

>  It is and it will probably start hitting the market sooner rather than
> later with new systems. Also, people with the right kind of Technet
> membership can download and use it shortly as well, not to mention all of
> the RC versions popping up everywhere. I’m very excited about the release as
> I’ve been playing with the RC and am really impressed.
>
>
>
> This underlines one of my major problems with NAC – they follow a business
> strategy when the vast majority (as far as I can tell) of businesses using
> the product are educational – where we have limited control over the variety
> of OSes we have to support, generally get them immediately, and end up
> bypassing NAC for those devices. That aligned with the lack of role nesting
> that makes granular work impractical, makes it virtually unusable. We are
> having to think very seriously as to whether or not we’re going continue
> with NAC (and the enforced, and expensive, upgrade coming down the pipe) or
> look toward something else.
>
>
>
> -          Sean
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Sean Hennessey, CCNA
>
> Network and Information Security Systems Administrator
>
> Office of Technical Support
>
> University of Portland
>
> w: (503) 943 7877, c: (503) 710 6347
>
>
>
> *From:* Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Lane Clark
> *Sent:* Monday, August 10, 2009 1:24 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Plans for Windows 7
>
>
>
> According to information week, Windows 7 is now available to business
> clients.  See link:
>
>
>
>
> http://www.informationweek.com/news/windows/operatingsystems/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=219100442&cid=nl_IW_daily_html
>
>
>
> Cisco has got to get this done.  We can't always be so far behind,
> especially when it comes to the security of our networks.
>
>
>
> Lane
>
>
>

Reply via email to