Hi Bertrand, I recently just worked on the UIMA integration (you can have a look at my presentation for the latest OSGi community event [1]) and I personally don't think I'll be working on the CMS stuff in the near future. I agree with you that at the moment it doesn't seem we have enough energy to keep Clerezza as is and I'd see joining Apache Stanbol the more reasonable move. Could we aim to be a proper Stanbol subproject ?
Thanks, Tommaso [1] : http://www.slideshare.net/teofili/adapting-apache-uima-to-osgi 2012/11/2 Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> > Hi, > > We need to report to the Incubator PMC this month, I think it's a good > opportunity to discuss the future of this project. > > What I see is: > > Very low activity related to Clerezza's core "semantic CMS" mission > > Some activity related to Clerezza's reusable semantic libraries > > Obvious decrease in commit activity since 2010: > > http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?path=%2Fincubator%2Fclerezza > > Little activity on lists > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-clerezza-dev/ and > jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA > > Is anyone planning to work more on the core CMS parts soon? > > Without that, I don't think the project can graduate as is, as the > activity on its core parts is not sufficient to sustain a project, > IMO. > > The alternative would be to donate the semantic libs to Stanbol, and > shut down the rest - people are free to fork the code elsewhere > anyway. > > WDYT? > > -Bertrand >
