I think there would be willing to maintain / work on the RDF API at least from a bunch of us (but obviously I can speak only for myself). I personally would be happy to keep the Clerezza - UIMA stuff and it may be ok for Stanbol as there is already something for that.
But however we perhaps should decide what we want to do first and then identify which parts can be ported afterwards. I tend to agree that the CMS stuff, even if good, has not been touched for some time and therefore wouldn't make much sense to keep on that but if Tsuy and/or others have different plans / point of views I'd be happy to hear :) Regards, Tommaso 2012/11/6 Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> > On Friday, November 2, 2012, Fabian Christ wrote: > > > moving Clerezza libs to Stanbol would be an option but I am wondering > > if the Stanbol community is strong enough to additionally maintain > > this code... > > Without having analyzed in detail, my impression was that the parts that > Stanbol uses are not very complex, so if the move is limited to those parts > that should be doable? I didn't mean to move the CMS-related parts of > Clerezza, just the reusable RDF and other libraries that Stanbol is using. > > > ...The people behind the code should be > > willing to move and keep contributing. Otherwise I see the potential > > that the Stanbol team decides to switch entirely from Clerezza to > > other alternatives.... > > Agreed, but if we consider the libraries that Stanbol is using, aren't > those people already Stanbol committers anyway, ? > > -Bertrand >
