On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:32:07AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 07:36:21PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > I'm now almost certain this is a bash problem > [...] > > So, it looks as if we need to apply the bash patches in chapter 6 > (temporary system). Unfortunately, proving that means starting over
Testing has been somewhat delayed by my adventures with e2fprogs, but a build is running at the moment. It's still building 64-bit glibc, but the test results from 32-bit glibc are not encouraging: an extra failure (one of the nptl tests, no big deal), and then c++-types-check.out failed (on the previous build, that only failed in 64-bit). So, applying the patch to bash in the temporary system will NOT reliably fix this failure. I still think it's probably bash-related, but I have no way of proving that, nor of fixing it. Maybe we should add a comment that c++-types-check often fails for unknown reasons ? I don't know which is worse - not mentioning a failure which people are fairly likely to see, or saying we haven't a clue. Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce _______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev
