Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:16:53PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 07:31:11PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Of course, if I'd looked at ticket #6 before writing that, I'd have
remembered that some of my scripts had been missing the libstdc++
symlink. I'm so embarrassed, but hopefully I'll get some of this
sorted before I go on holiday.
Well, I'm now on my third attempt to build ppc64 - the first two
attempts broke in e2fsprogs, and my diagnosis of the problem was
wrong (thought I'd updated my local linux-headers with a patch, in
fact the patch was also pulled in by my scripts).
So, considering that the first and second attempts were essentially
the same, I'm surprised that there were more failures in glibc tests
(-m64) on the first than on the second attempt.
The third attempt has now completed both versions of glibc, and to
my enormous surprise both of them only failed on annexc.out. In
other words, provided this build manages to complete e2fsprogs
(estimate 11pm tonight BST) then the toolchain tests for ppc64
should now all be good.
Of course, the fact that my 'bash-3.1: no such file' error didn't
show up makes me think that my earlier report of this on -m64 builds
is bogus, there was probably something strange in my temporary bash.
At least I'm used to making bogus bug reports!
If I had time, I'd rebuild x86_64-64, but I'm going to be away from
the middle of next week, and I don't think I'll be able to fit it in
before I go.
Ken
Ken, anything the rest of the team can do to help out for you, we want
to get rc4 out then release after that.
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev
