-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rob Landley wrote:
> On Sunday 13 August 2006 2:00 pm, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> The downside is that you
>> cannot run 32-bit binaries (primarily, plugins) so no realplayer, no
>> flash, and perhaps fewer av codecs available. And probably no OOo.
>
> Do you know if you can run Wine on a pure 64 bit system without 32 bit Linux
> binary support?
>
> Rob
Hi Rob,
I tried to use Wine some time ago and never found it very useful. What
types of applications do you run under wine? The only thing I use
Windows for any more is a couple of bible study programs I have. If I
thought there was a chance they might work under wine I would try and
compile and run it on my new CLFS/BLFS pure 64 system on AMD64 Athlon.
Since I see a few posts about wine I'm thinking it may have matured
since the last time I tried it and maybe the last time I just didn't
configure it properly. That was on a 32 bit system. Have you used it for
more than running sol?
Arnie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE352qI9lqJPlLBqQRAqHNAJ9baIcrHzujGyXNinWgcMegjr2yUQCfRwk3
Nm8wHMiWoICJOmDAACP75/w=
=Gqjg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Clfs-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support
