On 11/27/06, Joe Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Konrad Micinski wrote: > On 11/26/06, Joe Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> I think this might be a oversight when I made the cross_hacks patch. If >> you goto line 386 in Makerules and remove CFLAGS from that line. Does >> the package compile with CFLAGS set in your enviornment? >> > > > So, I removed CFLAGS from that line: > > native-compile.c = $(BUILD_CC) -g $< -c $(CPPFLAGS-native) > The old error is gone :-) ... but I have another one: > [snip] > > All I want to say is: " I like to play with glibc ;-) " You and me both! I attached the cross_hacks-2 patch for you to use instead of the cross_hacks-1 patch. I havn't tested it but I'm pretty sure that it will work for you, If it does I'll get it in the book. The difference between -1 and -2 is that -2 should only include the CFLAGS to compile the target. If this doesn't fix the issue, I'll try to re-create it here.
Wow! This patch works - glibc successfully compiled! Thank you, Joe, thank you very much :-) Regards Konrad Micinski _______________________________________________ Clfs-support mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support
