On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 06:56:58 GMT, vtstydev <d...@openjdk.org> wrote: >> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX, >> PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows >> platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper. > > vtstydev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Fix header and imports section in AlphaPrintingOffsets
I could not notice any difference related to "image" without fix and with fix as told in the test instructions. Only difference I noticed is in **margin rectangle** for "Landscape-Alpha" and "Reverse Landscape- Alpha" page 4 and 6 namely..What image difference should be looked for? I guess the instructions should be made more clearer for tester.. Attached are the printouts without the fix and with the fix [printout-withoutfix.pdf](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/files/14108433/printout-withoutfix.pdf) [printout-withfix.pdf](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/files/14108434/printout-withfix.pdf) ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030#issuecomment-1918615354
