On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:34:38 GMT, Julian Waters <jwat...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> In [JDK-8302671](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8302671) I fixed a 
>> memmove decay bug by rewriting a sizeof on an array to an explicit size of 
>> 256, but this is a bit of a band aid fix. It's come to my attention that in 
>> C++, one can pass an array by reference, which causes sizeof to work 
>> correctly on an array and has the added bonus of enforcing an array of that 
>> size on the arguments passed to that method. I've reverted my change from 
>> 8302671 and instead explicitly made kstate an array reference so that sizeof 
>> works on the array as expected, and that the array size can be explicitly 
>> set in the array brackets
>> 
>> Verification: https://godbolt.org/z/Ezj76eWWY and GitHub Actions
>
> Julian Waters has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Formatting sizeof awt_Component.cpp
>  - Formatting awt_Component.cpp
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into patch-10
>  - Update src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/awt_Component.cpp
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Alexey Ivanov <alexey.iva...@oracle.com>
>  - 8334599

I'd leave the memmove as it is unless someone can show a measurable benefit to 
changing to memcpy.

I do agree with the suggested formatting changes.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by prr (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19798#pullrequestreview-2167213082

Reply via email to