Part of why I didn't really follow through with this yet is that I'm actually not very interested in swing. After doing a 2 year contract using it I'm not sure I could use or recommend swing for anything substantial with a straight face. I find it clumsy and over complicated. Even still, it seems that it could be fun to use it for small stuff from Clojure.
I've been using Flex a lot lately and it is a very nice way to do GUI programming. Not perfect, but better than other things I've used by quite a margin. I'll be sure to check out Shoes. Thanks for the tip. Michael On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Stuart Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 8, 6:19 pm, "Michael Beauregard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> This doesn't address the functional/stateless impedance mismatch, but >> would make defining guis simpler. However, the basic idea is to >> represent the containment hierarchy inherent in a gui with the nesting >> of lisp expressions. > > That's a cool idea. Reminds me of Shoes: http://shoooes.net/ > It's a clever little Ruby GUI that uses nested containers and > anonymous callback functions. > -Stuart Sierra > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
