Great article, but I'm not sure this part in the keyword section is correct:
"Keywords exist simply because, as you'll see, it's useful to have names in code which are symbol-like but not actually symbols. Keywords have no concept of being namespace qualified as they have nothing to do with namespaces." Isn't it possible to qualify keywords like :clojure/tag? On Dec 11, 6:58 am, janus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Timothy, > Your post is a great one indeed , you have developed a template that > anyone could use to introduce Clojure. I would implore to fresh out > thoughts and deepen it for all to enjoy. > > Emeka --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
