On Jan 14, 12:07 pm, "Michael Harrison (goodmike)" <goodmike...@gmail.com> wrote: > But I'm not afraid of using reduce, map, and apply to prepare values > to use as arguments to built-ins. And I'm not afraid to encapsulate > this into my own functions when I need to. I'm OK with building up a > bit of a language for whatever problem I'm tackling. (There's the > schemaniac in me again.) There's a golden mean between complexity and > clarity. At first glance, Jason's suggestions seem close to that mean > to me, and I really like what he's done. > > Thanks for the good work, Jason!
My pleasure, thank you :). And let me in turn say, many thanks to Rich and all the other contributors who have made Clojure so great, and have been extremely understanding and helpful throughout my learning process. -Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
