On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 1:36:53 PM UTC-5, Kevin Baldor wrote: > > I'm interested in the answer to whether it is just an accident of > implementation or if there is some compelling reason for the global > registry. >
With spec we wish to encourage the use of attributes with good (qualified) names and global semantics. While I haven't seen a strong use case for something beyond the global registry, that also doesn't rule out the idea of something else in the future. On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Mark <markaddle...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm a bit surprised by this. It seems that the use of the global >> registry limits spec to development use cases. Is that intentional? Maybe >> I'm worried over nothing >> > I don't see how that limits it to dev use cases. Can you explain more why you say that? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
