Re: Symbols evaluated at compile time?

[Meikel Brandmeyer]

Hi,

Am 16.03.2009 um 22:19 schrieb Elena:

On 16 Mar, 21:57, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:

not the second step to cleaning up my programs.


possibility to factorize between several functions.


of the functions of my current file.


that libraries in their own namespace show up.


that fast in my programming cycle.

I agree that it's not difficult. But, at least in my own experience, it's I generally try to get code that works, even if in a not really good looking shape. Then I refactor if it is really ugly-looking, or when I see the So I end up with more general functions, but still, I'm not sure if they deserve their own lib. And maybe they're just general enough for the purpose It's in a third time, when I want to share code between several namespaces, So I think there's room for what I suggested, because the step to seperate functions into libs by a criteria of level of abstraction does not appear

You have just described my way of churning out code for fast
prototypes and ad-hoc programs. Abstractions and cleaning up come
later, once I've understood the task at hand better.

Sometimes, I don't understand you guys. You claim that you have
to develop bottom-up, when in fact you do top-down. I really don't
see the problem with the current behaviour...

Sincerely
Meikel

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature