2009/3/16 Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> > Hi, > > Am 16.03.2009 um 22:19 schrieb Elena: > > On 16 Mar, 21:57, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> I agree that it's not difficult. But, at least in my own experience, it's >>> not the second step to cleaning up my programs. >>> >>> I generally try to get code that works, even if in a not really good >>> looking >>> shape. Then I refactor if it is really ugly-looking, or when I see the >>> possibility to factorize between several functions. >>> >>> So I end up with more general functions, but still, I'm not sure if they >>> deserve their own lib. And maybe they're just general enough for the >>> purpose >>> of the functions of my current file. >>> >>> It's in a third time, when I want to share code between several >>> namespaces, >>> that libraries in their own namespace show up. >>> >>> So I think there's room for what I suggested, because the step to >>> seperate >>> functions into libs by a criteria of level of abstraction does not appear >>> that fast in my programming cycle. >>> >> >> You have just described my way of churning out code for fast >> prototypes and ad-hoc programs. Abstractions and cleaning up come >> later, once I've understood the task at hand better. >> > > Sometimes, I don't understand you guys. You claim that you have > to develop bottom-up, when in fact you do top-down. I really don't > see the problem with the current behaviour...
Hello Meikel, In french, we have a sentence for that, that would translate literally into "eat the banana by both ends at the same time". I don't think top-down and bottom-up programming are antogonists. I often do both at the same time myself. > > > Sincerely > Meikel > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
