I keep coming into situations where I'd like a let in the middle of my cond. I often do a couple of tests, then would like to lock down some symbols that I'll use frequently in the remaining cases.
There's a precedent for this, in that the for macro allows a :let as an alternative to a list interpolation term. I'm working on my own implementation of cond to support this and would like to see it in core. Thoughts? -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
