Coming right up! On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So you have a working version of this macro, as well as some use cases > in actual code? This would help the discussion a lot. > > Thanks! > > On Oct 17, 10:43 am, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I keep coming into situations where I'd like a let in the middle of my >> cond. I often do a couple of tests, then would like to lock down some >> symbols that I'll use frequently in the remaining cases. >> >> There's a precedent for this, in that the for macro allows a :let as >> an alternative to a list interpolation term. >> >> I'm working on my own implementation of cond to support this and would >> like to see it in core. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -- >> Howard M. Lewis Ship >> >> Creator of Apache Tapestry >> >> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to >> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! >> >> (971) 678-5210http://howardlewisship.com > > >
-- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
