So you have a working version of this macro, as well as some use cases in actual code? This would help the discussion a lot.
Thanks! On Oct 17, 10:43 am, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote: > I keep coming into situations where I'd like a let in the middle of my > cond. I often do a couple of tests, then would like to lock down some > symbols that I'll use frequently in the remaining cases. > > There's a precedent for this, in that the for macro allows a :let as > an alternative to a list interpolation term. > > I'm working on my own implementation of cond to support this and would > like to see it in core. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > Creator of Apache Tapestry > > The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to > learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! > > (971) 678-5210http://howardlewisship.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
