On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 17:02, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > >>> Are there any plans to add -$> to core or contrib? >> >> The rules on contrib are that the work must be original to the author. Even >> with Andrew's disclaimer that it be considered public domain, he would still >> need a contributor agreement in place to get this incorporated into contrib. >> >> I haven't tried using -$> yet, but based on its description it seems like it >> would be a useful addition to contrib. > > There is also an old discussion about this: pipe, let->, pipe-as, and > what not > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/66ff0b89229be894/c3d4a6dae45d4852?q=pipe+group:clojure#c3d4a6dae45d4852
+1 for pipe-as in contrib. But frankly I'd be glad seeing *any* of these macros in contrib.macros (this one seems quite abandoned with 3 macros only, huh?) or wherever in contrib. Let the contributors decide & go with it, that will push it to use, for good. I wrote a bunch of similar stuff but not so general; it arises from a need to control order of passed forms while sticking to 'threading' style, as this style helps in grasping how data is transformed (btw it's a thought raised a couple of times, see eg. recent blog of Tim Bray cited here). It'd be very cool to see these threading augmentations standarized a bit. cheers Wojtek -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
