On Apr 29, 3:21 am, ataggart <alex.tagg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Functions named contains-key? and contains-val? would make a lot more > sense to me than the current contains? and new seq-contains?.
Amen. Even independent of any performance expectations. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
