On Jun 16, 9:24 pm, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote: > Mostly I'd like feedback on the > tutorial:http://github.com/technomancy/leiningen/blob/master/TUTORIAL.md
It looks quite good. Maybe some mention of `lein clean` is warranted. It would preclude a lot of the "Hey I just upgraded library X and now everything is broken" kinds of questions I see on various mailing lists. The part discussing the group-id/artifact-id etc. is great for those of us who don't know maven. Can you consider adding something about how to name a project in project.clj so that it can be pushed to clojars cleanly? On clojars you see projects named with a bare word, like "compojure" and "swank-clojure", and then others with a one-word group-id, "foo/bar", then others with a full domain, "org.clojars.someguy/baz". This is a bit of a mess. But I wonder how many packages are pushed to clojars under the wrong name or wrong group-id accidentally, not realizing how it would end up looking. It might be helpful to promote a convention for project naming, if nothing else. Or if there's already some convention that I'm missing, maybe explain the convention. Just a thought. --Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
