On 19 June 2010 16:43, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > "Most real world programs". You mean like Clojure itself? > Please look over the implementation of gvec before making statements like > this:
Surely Clojure's internals are a *very* special case though... I wouldn't find it particularly worrying if they turned out to require some hinting. I suppose even Ruby 1.8 must have its fair share of full-speed C math under the hood (disclaimer: I'm not a Rubyist though, so I never cared to check), which has nothing to do with the performance of math in user programmes, which is what I interpreted Mike's statement to be referring to. Sincerely, Michał -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
