Hi, Am 09.07.2010 um 23:47 schrieb zkim:
> I kind of went back and forth on this. Originally I only parsed out > public vars, but in a couple of instances I found that when tracing > through some code I would hit on private vars. I'm suspicious of showing source code to the reader with everything more than a small quite nondescript link. The contract is the docstring. Looking at the code might be interesting but non-helpful. You start relying on implementation details, while these might change at any time (eg. introduction of transients, etc.). I would *not* show the source code and I would *not* document private vars. They are not part of the contract and should not show up in public API documentation. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
