On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Jeff Rose <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Luckily for us, I think the tide is already rising on this
> conversation.  Most prominent Clojure libraries are adopting the same
> packaging scheme as clojure.core, and we are uploading our libraries
> to the wild and crazy, totally uncensored and unmonitored clojars.org,
> which is working out great in tandem with lein.  Clojars wasn't a
> failed experiment, it's the future.

Right, I think we have a consensus of sorts here: if you are worried
for some reason about naming collisions, then by all means use the
verbose reverse domain name. The rest of us will all use the
uncluttered way.

-Phil

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to