On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Jeff Rose <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > Luckily for us, I think the tide is already rising on this > conversation. Most prominent Clojure libraries are adopting the same > packaging scheme as clojure.core, and we are uploading our libraries > to the wild and crazy, totally uncensored and unmonitored clojars.org, > which is working out great in tandem with lein. Clojars wasn't a > failed experiment, it's the future.
Right, I think we have a consensus of sorts here: if you are worried for some reason about naming collisions, then by all means use the verbose reverse domain name. The rest of us will all use the uncluttered way. -Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en