"Meikel Brandmeyer" <m...@kotka.de> wrote: >Hi, > >Am 07.07.2010 um 18:13 schrieb James Reeves: > >> - foo.core >> - com.github.weavejester.foo > >I would go with one of these two. At the moment I prefer the former. I think >putting domain names in the package is suboptimal for a quite simple reason. >I'm a hobbyist. I don't own a domain. Eh? What to put there? nil.foo? So I >choose the hosting site. com.google.code.foo. Ah. I move to github. So rename >everything to com.github.foo. Iegh. github sucks. So next rename to >org.gitorious.foo. Ah. I like mercurial better. org.bitbucket.foo.
Why bother renaming it when you move? You're going to want to put a redirect up at the old site anyway. Just leave it there until the project dies. That's actually better than using your own domain name. Should you change domain names, you have to keep paying for it or loose it. With a repo provider, it's generally free. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
