On Sep 9, 2010, at 6:36 PM, David Nolen wrote: > > I started using Processing since version 22 (around 2003/4). Let's just > say... that it takes a lot of time and external contribution to reach the > level of documentation, stability and cross platform reliability that > Processing now has.
Understood. It will take time for Clojure too. I'm just pointing out that this level of "simplicity for the simple stuff" is a worthy goal to aim for. Some others in this thread seem to think it's unimportant because real world applications aren't simple, or because we should assume that developers can handle the complexity, etc. Or maybe they don't see the complexity. In any event my aim was just to argue that it really is important and that there are some good models out there to aim for, eventually. -Lee -- Lee Spector, Professor of Computer Science School of Cognitive Science, Hampshire College 893 West Street, Amherst, MA 01002-3359 lspec...@hampshire.edu, http://hampshire.edu/lspector/ Phone: 413-559-5352, Fax: 413-559-5438 Check out Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines: http://www.springer.com/10710 - http://gpemjournal.blogspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
