On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:26 PM, Ken Wesson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Brian Goslinga > <quickbasicg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This topic has been discussed to death before on this group. > > If so, it was before I joined.
That's what archives are for: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/search?group=clojure&q=primitive+math See in particular the threads "Enhanced primitive support" and "Enhanced primitive support - redux". >> Doing the right thing is actually harder than you might first think > > But it's also already being done by Clojure 1.2 so I don't see how > that's relevant. If someone proposed a novel behavior, it being > "harder than you might first think" would be a point against that > proposal. However it cannot logically ever be a point against keeping > current behavior. Are you saying that simplifying existing code provides no benefit? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
