On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Alessio Stalla <alessiosta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It could be written on top of Common Lisp. There are natively compiled, > multithreaded, cross-platform implementations of it, and building on another > Lisp should be much easier than on C/C++. Of course, since Clojure programs > often rely on Java libraries to do some of their work, porting won't be a > no-brainer. I am not a Clojure expert. But if I understood Clojure correctly, Clojure would not be Clojure if it where natively compiled. Eg. The whole lazy seq's are required because of lack of tail call optimization in the JVM. Or am I wrong? -- http://about.me/santosh.rajan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
