Hi Peter,

2011/1/3 Peter Schuller <peter.schul...@infidyne.com>

> > Good feedback. Thanx. I guess I'm used to reading wikis on github as
> > being the official project home pages but I can see your p.o.v.
>
> I'm not taking a position specifically for this thread (only sifted
> through it, and I haven't had that particular problem with ccw), but
> here is another POV:
>
> Ever since Sourceforge became popular and started the project hosting
> thing, I have continually been annoyed when (1) people link to and (2)
> google results prefer the sf/github/bitbucket/gcode/whatever page
> instead of the manually maintained project page.
>
> The reason is that they are essentially boilerplate that waste my
> time, if I am not actively knowledgable about the project already.
> Since all projects have the same structure, you essentially know
> nothing just by looking at the project summary. You have to dig around
> a bit to get a feel for whether it's a live, whether you're in the
> right place for documentation and whether the community is
> "elsewhere".
>
> A similar effect is what you get with projects that use maven to
> generate a boilerplate website. You don't know whether it's actually
> filled in, and whether it is worth clicking around to find real
> information.
>
> A manually maintained project website, even if completely
> non-fashionable, on the other hand gives me an instant feel for the
> project. News items on the front page indicate liveness, manually
> hand-picked links and decided structure hopefully gives a good crash
> course/crash intro as to what it is etc.
>

FYI, the main page of ccw is manually maintained and contains up to date
information wrt current plugin status.
That's maybe why you didn't have to /specifically/ complain 'bout ccw itself
;-)


>
> Again, just another POV. Take it with a grain of salt. But know that
> I'm speaking *as a developer*, just not as a developer *of those
> things* that I am trying to find/use/read about.
>
> --
> / Peter Schuller
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to