They used to give you compile switches for that kind of stuff, not hope and wholesome wishes. Seems like every performance improvements makes the language more complex, uglier or both.
On Jan 14, 2:40 pm, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Debatable it is, endlessly. ;) So Clojure committers made a choice. > Hopefully, they have made a choice that has: > > * a small positive effect (better performance with less effort) on a > majority of users > > * a small negative effect (worse performance, extra effort) on a minority > > -S -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
