On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Stuart Halloway > <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> We have thought about this quite a bit, and an argument from one axis only >> (e.g safe/unsafe) that doesn't even mention some of the other axes is not >> likely to be persuasive. Would be more interesting to see a new axis we >> haven't thought of... > > Here's an axis that hasn't gotten much discussion: How evident is the > behavior of Clojure code, and what features help and hinder this > clarity?
[massive snip] > This is an axis I think about a lot, and I hope this is something that > the Clojure dev team is carefully considering as well. +1 to all of that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
