you mean inc

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Dennis Crenshaw <crensha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What makes an ecosystem '1.x' vs '2.x' etc. needs to be quantifiable
> to make a standard out of it. To quote Peter Drucker, "What gets
> measured gets managed." Are there any solid examples of languages that
> would constitute a good canonical spectrum for ecosystem versions and
> why?
>
> It seems like if the ecosystem surrounding a language is another
> concern in the semantic versioning equation that can't be sufficiently
> be expressed by the existing scheme, there should be a another
> digit(s) or a whole other semantic version system for it (e.g. 1.2.0.0
> or perhaps 0.1.0_2.0.0 for Clojure 2.0 with a basic, whatever that may
> mean, ecosystem surrounding it.)
>
> My points may also be a moot point, since it seems to make this SemVer
> compatible we might have to call it SemVer 1.1.0, or 2.0 depending on
> how people thought the extra digit(s) would affect the compatibility
> with the SemVer spec as it stands. (Is it SemVer 1.0.0 right now?)
>
> All this being said, I like the idea of semantic versioning and I wish
> more languages/software at least attempted some sort of version number
> scheme transparency. #(+ 1 %) to semantic versioning.
>
> TL;DR Can an ecosystem be properly versioned? Can that version be
> cleanly expressed by the current SemVer scheme?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en



-- 
And what is good, Phaedrus,
And what is not good—
Need we ask anyone to tell us these things?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to