On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:36 PM, Ken Wesson wrote: > But "1.3" may overpromise and underdeliver backward compatibility.
It depends, I suppose, on whether people who are already using Clojure 1.2 will blindly upgrade to 1.3/2.0 without having read anything that will warn them what to expect. I like semantic versioning myself, but I think considerations are different for peripheral libraries like mine than they are for the foundational core of the whole shebang. ----- Brian Marick, Artisanal Labrador Contract programming in Ruby and Clojure Author of /Ring/ (forthcoming; sample: http://exampler.com/tmp/ring.pdf) www.exampler.com, www.exampler.com/blog, www.twitter.com/marick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
