On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Peter Taoussanis <ptaoussa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can't really comment on how easily Clojure works for large groups of > developers as such. The flexibility thing might start losing it's > charm when you have 10 different coding styles competing with one > another under time constraints, etc. (where discipline starts to go > out the window in favour of "getting stuff done").
So far, the Clojure culture has strongly encouraged a sense for particular idiomatic coding conventions for most common tasks; so hopefully "10 different coding styles competing with one another" won't be the sort of issue it might be if you were using, say, Common Lisp. -- Protege: What is this seething mass of parentheses?! Master: Your father's Lisp REPL. This is the language of a true hacker. Not as clumsy or random as C++; a language for a more civilized age. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
