On Jul 13, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote: >> Or it could just be that some of the other things on that list were so >> compelling that they overshadowed these. >> >> * The REPL >> * Functional Programming >> * Ease of development > > True. Look at the results - the top five big wins are: > * Functional programming > * Platform (JVM) compatibility / interop > * The REPL > * Immutability > > Next are Macros, Concurrency, Ease of development. Also "big wins". I > think folks would have to check almost everything to put the features > Chas highlighted into the "big wins" category. > > Perhaps a more interesting question for next year would be: "Which of > the following Clojure features are you using?" - they don't have to be > big wins but it would be nice to know how widely used they are.
My phrasing may very well have gotten in the way. "Big wins" isn't exactly precise language. :-( - Chas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
