On Jul 24, 2011, at 1:11 PM, James Keats wrote: >> Restricting yourself to a functional subset of JavaScript can't fix >> JavaScript. The functional subset stinks, Javascript notaries be damned. > > If so where does this leave clojure itself and its advocacy of > functional programming, then; see last paragraph of my reply to Mark.
You can't draw any inference along those lines from David's observation. The functional parts of Javascript are far different from those of Clojure (and not in a good way). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
