>
> Javascript is simply painful to use functionally. The verbosity of
> anonymous functions, the lack of crucial HOFs like map/filter/reduce, the
> lack of functional data structures, the lack of macros (not strictly a
> "functional" feature, but especially useful with functional code)... You can
> fix these to varying degrees with libraries; but in any case the overall
> superiority of Clojure syntax and data structures must be obvious to anyone
> interested in ClojureScript, since those are the sole advantages it provides
> over Javascript.
>
>
The verbosity of anonymous function (and much more) is fixed by CoffeeScript
and Coco[1] and the lack of crucial HOFs is fixed by underscore.js

1: Coco is a CoffeeScript fork that fixes the main issues CoffeeScript have
(example: CoffeeScript's scope is broken).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to