On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Raju Bitter <rajubit...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Thanks for sharing the code with us, Filip. I have one additional > question: Which parts of ClojureScript were documented well enough for > you, and where was it difficult to find enough information on how to > implemented certain features? > There is always some room for improvement, but in my experience the documentation is sufficient. If I had to come up with a suggestion it would be an overview of ClojureScript specific functions like (js->clj) and (js-obj)) and implementation details. I'm happy to see the ClojureScript ecosystem growing this fast and to see the increasing amount of information and tips from people on this list, blogs, et cetera. With a new project like ClojureScript there is always a certain amount of polish that still needs to be applied, but I can't say that a lack of documentation has hindered my productivity in any way. -fmw -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
