On 1 Sep 2011, at 09:35, Alan Malloy wrote:
> I don't see any reason for it to include !=, which can be implemented
> as (not (= a b)). Conversely, <= could be implemented as (or (< a b)
> (= a b)), but if either of those is expensive operations he gives you
> a chance to do a more-optimized <=. There's not much point in forcing
> people to implement not= for each data type, if it can be implemented
> once elsewhere.
Interesting - perhaps I misunderstand the usage of the library - so please
correct me if I'm on the wrong track.
We currently use the library to overload many of the standard mathematical
operations which have a double meaning in a signal processing context. From
what I understand of the generic libs, they give you a way of overriding these
operations using multimethods. I'm interested in overriding != in a similar way:
(defmethod (symbol "clojure.contrib.generic.comparison" "!=")
[:overtone.sc.ugen.sc-ugen/sc-ugen :overtone.sc.ugen.sc-ugen/sc-ugen]
[a b]
(my-special-ugen-not-equal-impl a b))
How might this be achieved by overriding other operations?
Sam
---
http://sam.aaron.name
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
