On 6 Sep, 2011, at 12:43 , Sam Aaron wrote: >> I have added a plain function not= to clojure.algo.generic.comparison as a >> convenience, it is just the negation of generic =. > > Would this still allow the overriding of not= to do somethign different to > the negation of generic =. If not, how might I achieve this?
Just define your own multimethod not= instead! Konrad. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
