> Seems to me that if you're going to use metadata to communicate intention 
> about dynamic binding in *one* way of creating a new var, you should do it 
> with *all* ways of creating a new var.

And you may be right. My point was that a var's dynamic nature is part
of its state: it's primarily data, but exists also as metadata (like
static for functions). This kind of thing happens when you keep data
in two places. IMO, metadata isn't the right way to enter modifiers;
an optional symbol might be better.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to