On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Dennis Haupt <d.haup...@googlemail.com> wrote: > if by compatible you mean "has a specific set of functions and fields", > then scala can do that without sacrificing static type safety:
Yes, I started working with Scala in 2009 and it's certainly much better than Java but it still forces you to express that sort of commonality thru the type system. Scala is getting dynamic types... -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
